sorry for wasting the list's time on this - but by god, do I hate
misconfigured spamassasin installs.
srs
> This is the Postfix program at host mail.open-systems.org.
>
[...]
>
> <Kevin.A.Sindhu@???>: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.7.0
Message
> content rejected, id=19612-07 (in reply to end of DATA command)
On Monday, February 03, 2003 3:10 AM [GMT+0530=IST],
Suresh Ramasubramanian <mallet@???> wrote:
> On Monday, February 03, 2003 8:10 AM [GMT+0530=IST],
> Kevin Sindhu <Kevin.A.Sindhu@???> wrote:
>
>> Hi Suresh,
>>
>> My MTA tagged your mail as spam. I can send more details if you'd
>> like.
>> Looks like what you relayed via in list.dsbl.org
>>
>
> Try updating - I think spamass 2.2x has me in its whitelist.
>
> Why are you wasting time checking _all_ Received headers for dialup
> blocks?
>
> All this means is that you are going to tag any mail that was sent
> from a dialup (or rather, dynamic IP ADSL in my case) and relayed
> through a different smtp server (my colo box, frodo.hserus.net, in
> this case) as spam.
>
> You are basically just wasting your time checking for dialups / dnsbl
> IPs in headers other than the first Received: header ...
>
> srs
>
>>>>> SPAM: [RBL check: found
>>>>> 59.83.11.61.list.dsbl.org]
>
>>> SPAM: [RBL check: found
>>> 59.83.11.61.relays.osirusoft.com., type: 127.0.0.3]
>>> SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a relay in
>>> ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
>>> SPAM: [RBL check: found
>>> 59.83.11.61.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6]
>>> SPAM: X_OSIRU_DUL (0.6 points) RBL: DNSBL: sender ip address
>>> in in
>>> a dialup block
