On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Nico Erfurth wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:49:23PM +0000, Philip Hazel wrote:
> >
> >>Correct. Well, to be pedantic, the OS does the setuid(0), but Exim
> >>quickly reverses it. A quick test with -d shows it:
> >
> >
> > Surely it only does a seteuid(0)... :-)
> >
> > MBM (ducks)
>
> You can't duck enough ;)
You can't be pedantic enough, either, it seems :-)
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
