Nico Erfurth wrote:
> It's perfectly legal for an domain to have no MX-record, the MTA will
> fallback to the A-record in this case.
Yeah I know tha, but as a policy I don't want to know of any hosts who
don't have MX'es. Thats just my own policy, facist tho it maybee.
> what you want is
>
> require message = Can't route to sender domain
> verify = sender
Hmm odd, I've tried this and it seemed to callback. I must of been
making assumptions, teach me not to -d it :)
> This will NOT start an callout, but route the address through exim, and
> try to find a router that can send to this address.
Which means that it's going to suceed if they have no MX, but an
A record right?
> I hope you don't use 4.11, it's very buggy :-/
nah, 4.12, Was just pointing to the right place iin Changelog ;)
> > How do you setup a non-SMTP acl? I've had a look at the docs (4.10-spec),
> > but can't seem to find a reference.
>
> see 49.v in the NewStuff file.
Ta will go look :)
D.
