Re: [Exim] Curious difference between 3.35 and 4.12

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Philip Hazel
Fecha:  
A: Tony Finch
Cc: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [Exim] Curious difference between 3.35 and 4.12
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Tony Finch wrote:

> >. The always_bcc option has been abolished. If an incoming message has no To:
> > or Cc: headers, Exim now always adds an empty Bcc: line. This makes the
> > message valid for RFC 822 (sic). In time, this can be removed, because RFC
> > 2822 does not require there to be a recipient header.
>
> Why the "sic"?


To make it crystal clear that that wasn't a typo for 2822.

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.