Re: [Exim] Retrying after a long period of failure: opinions…

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

> What wasn't suggested, which surprised me, was to simply toggle the
> default value of delay_after_cutoff to false.
>
> Default options should work best for the masses. It seems to me that
> the masses would be best served by no_delay_after_cutoff.

I think that is arguable either way. Therefore I decided to make no
change.

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.