On (2003/01/13 17:12), Philip Hazel wrote:
> > Hmmm, does that mean that exim-3.xx's behaviour (splitting long log
> > messages over multiple lines in the syslog logging case) has been
> > "corrected" in exim-4.xx?
>
> My understanding, when I implemented syslog, was that there was a limit
> to the length of line that syslog could handle.
If I can prove that this is not the case for BSD, would you consider a
build-time option for single-line syslogging?
