At 21:08 +0000 2002/12/23, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
> > >detected in earlier phases is to postpone the 5xx response until the
>> >RCPT TO phase.
>>
> > are you really postponing?
>
>Yes, we postpone the tests... ;-)
ah!
> > Can you preserve a state from the MAIL FROM acl to the RCPT TO acl?
>
>For the testable things that I had in mind, one can postpone testing
>them until the RCPT TO phase: it isn't necessary to perform the tests
>at the first possible moment and then need to remember the result.
>If you see what I mean.
I was actually more interested in some state that can be preserved
during the whole transaction, so that one could have a sort of
scoring or conditional system without having to write (and run) a
multitude of complex acls.
I had my recipies too, but now that I have taken another domain with
about 12 (!) users, I cannot apply them blindly. I have instead
adopted three RBLs, and will see how they'll compare (my old rules
are still tagging the messages, before the rbls, so I can see which
one performs better).
Probably Philip will not read this far... but I would really like to
have counters or string variables (just a handful).
Giuliano
--
H U M P H
|| |||
software
Java & C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X
http://www.humph.com/
