On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> 2002-12-17 14:05:09 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> 2002-12-17 14:22:20 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> 2002-12-17 14:23:23 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> 2002-12-17 14:46:24 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> 2002-12-17 14:48:11 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> 2002-12-17 14:53:56 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> 2002-12-17 15:09:28 18Kiq4-0006UQ-00 == cwu4@??? routing defer (-42): retry time not reached
> # exinext cwu4@???
> Deliver: cwu4@??? 0 77 SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO [<cwu4@???>:] error host: [152.1.
> first failed: 05-Dec-2002 21:18:16
> last tried: 17-Dec-2002 14:03:27
> next try at: 17-Dec-2002 22:03:27
> past final cutoff time
What is on the log around 14:03, that is, the last time it claims to
have tried? The logs for 14:05 onwards would seem to be correct, since
the next retry time isn't till 22:03:27.
Did some other message try that address around 14:03?
Ah! Just noticed something else. It says "routing defer", but the
exinext output is for a delivery defer. Maybe there's something else in
there.
Please use exim_dumpdb on your retry data, and grep out any references
to eos.ncsu.edu. In particular, see if there are any that start with R:
instead of T:.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
