On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Nico Erfurth wrote:
> Hmmm, can't we do it with a global string that's published in
> local_scan.h? (I know, that's not clean, but it won't break everything).
Yes, that's perhaps a way to do it. I'm now closing the doors on the
contents of the 4.11 release, so in any case it will now have to wait.
> The most clean way (without breaking compatibility) would be a new
> local_scan-interface (local_scan2), and a wrapper-function for the old
> interface, like someone else mentioned.
Seems a lot to have to maintain *and document* for a feature that
apparently only one person wants.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
