On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:55:32AM -0000, Clive Goodhead wrote:
> It appears to me that if a warning header is added in an
> 'acl_smtp_rcpt' ACL and the header added depends on whether or
> not the domain is local or not then two different messages (i.e.,
> one with the new header and one without) will be passed to the
> local_scan() function.
>
> I am looking for confirmation that the above is indeed the case.
You are correct, the above will work, I use it from SA-Exim.
BTW, you're welcome to borrow code if that can help
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/sa-exim-cvs/sa-exim.c
> I am also looking for confirmation that the addition of the header
> described above would cause a maximun of two messages to be
> processed, i.e., it would not for some reason cause exim to
> process a message for each recipient.
You only see one, exim ACLs do not duplicate a messsage internally to
add a header for some receipients but not others.
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@??? for PGP key
