On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:29:08PM +0100, Nico Erfurth wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> >>I see no problem with using @mx_secondary in my relay_to_domains list.
> >Roll on Yet Another Open Relay.
> Why it should be?
> The spammer hardly can modify the dns-entries of his target.
I count an Open Relay as anything which relays *any* (not all) mail from
a destination to a target without the knowledge of the administrator. In
this case, it is possible to do this, therefore it is an open relay.
Oh, and have you ever heard of cache-poisoning?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <mbm@???> http://colondot.net/
