On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 16:07, Tabor J. Wells wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:08:33AM +0000,
> Philip Hazel <ph10@???> is thought to have said:
>
> > I think it's becoming clear that the changes have had negative effects,
> > and perhaps I should go back to the original wording, which did not
> > mention Exim, nor anything about the server.
>
> How about "Exim mail server software running at $primary_hostname"
I'd much prefer it if it said
"Microsoft Exchange software running at $primary_hostname - complaints
to support@???"
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
