Author: Michael Jakscht Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [Exim] What's this all about?? <Queue running, Exim 3.36 on
RedHat 7.3>
> IIRC you never should remove Return-Path.
Why not? Sorry for this stupid question...
I think I added this because when we try to send emails to the outgoing
world from our IBM host, all headers get rewritten except of this
Return-Path. So I simply cut it out then I thought...
No good??
> Ok, in both routers you check for the sender_address_domain,
> and i guess, your spooled mails have another sender_address_domain
> than vit.de or nlb.de (maybe they are empty, because they are
> bounces?), thats why the routers decline.
Ah I see. Okay.
> > #lookuphost:
> > # driver = lookuphost
> > # headers_add = X-INFO: processed by a ROUTER (lookuphost)
> > # transport = remote_smtp
> > # ignore_target_hosts = 127.0.0.0/8 > Normaly this router should catch everything else > Can you be sure that noone uses another mail-addresses from the inside
> network? And, your solutions makes it impossible to deliver bounces,
> because bounces will be send with a empty sender_address_domain.
Yes, absolutely. We only have to domains which have to be allowed to send
mails out...
Is there a possibility to deliver these bounces without having to add a
general router??
