Regards,
Chris Knipe
Cell: (072) 434-7582
/-------
| This email is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.
| If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use
| the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error,
| please notify us immediately by return email and delete the document.
\-------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Knipe" <savage@???>
To: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 PM
Subject: [Exim] Convert4r4 script
> > if it was only some minor issues for you then you had better luck than
I
> > did. I had unknown options, and even one or two lines that ended in _ in
> the
> > finished v4 config file. I don't recall exactly what it was, but it was
> the
> > first two portions of a v3 config element. I.E.. if the v3 element was
> > my_config_element, then the config file for v4 showed my_config_ as a
> > keyword. Obviously that wouldn't work :>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Green" <jeff@???>
> > To: "Dan Egli" <dan@???>; <exim-users@???>
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Exim] Convert4r4 script
> >
> >
> > > At 09:36 AM 11/1/02 , Dan Egli wrote:
> > > >Anyone know what the current status of this script is? I downloaded
> exim
> > v4
> > > >some time ago, compiled it, but when I ran the convert script it
hosed
> my
> > > >exim v4 config file. I mentioned this to Philip, and he said he'd
look
> > into
> > > >it and that was the last I heard of it. I'd like to use exim v4 if I
> can
> > but
> > > >I have so many options customized in my v3 config file that I'd need
to
> > > >spend a few days researching how to implement the same in exim v4.
> That's
> > > >where the script comes into play.
> > >
> > > I recently upgraded to 4.10 from 3.35 using the script as the basis,
and
> > > also found a few errors. A few minutes checking against the Exim 4
> default
> > > configuration file and a peek or two at the 4.10 spec cleared them up.
> > > There were only a few errors, notably domainlist local_domains had a
> > couple
> > > of unwanted entries, and syntax on the check_recipient (acl_smtp_rcpt)
> acl
> > > was a bit off. Other than that, it was pretty clean.
> > >
> > > So nice to be in version 4. Kudos to Phil and all who contribute. Hope
> > > Debian catches up soon, I don't like being outside the distribution
> tree.
> > >
> > > jbg
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeffrey B. Green Personal Computer Consultant - Las Vegas, Nevada
> > > http://jbgreen.com Networking Las Vegas Since 1986
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
> details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
> >
>
