As an exercise to become more familiar with the 'condition =' statement,
I attempted to configure Exim to do this check itself. However, I don't
think its possible to check for a header which is added during Transport,
from a condition inside a Director. Am I missing something, or is this
a valid statement?
hank
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:30:59PM -0500, Adam Henry wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:13:57PM -0500, Adam Henry wrote:
> > The second option I see, and maybe a little more drastic, is to do a
> > little header rewriting. Since I do not want to just refuse mail if
> > the To: address doesn't agree with the RCPT TO: address, would there be
> > much harm in rewriting to To: to reflect the value given at the RCPT TO:
> > command? This would let SA do its job more effectively, but I am worried
> > that I'm not thinking of a scenario in which mail delivery would suffer.
> >
> > The other option, of course, is to figure a way to make SA check the
> > RCPT TO: header instead of To:. Conceptually, is this the wrong way to
> > approach the problem?
>
> I think my best solution is to use a combination of both. Instead of
> rewriting the From: address (someone quoted it as being Mortal Sin),
> I will utilize the Envelope-to: header. Now I just have to get SA to
> check this header, which is an exercise for myself.
>
> Thanks for listening!
>
> hank
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
Adam Henry <hank@???> | Phn: 440.354.1458x24
Marinar Communications Group | Mob: 440.742.0011
