Re: [Exim] spamassassin whitelist

On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:13:57PM -0500, Adam Henry wrote:
> The second option I see, and maybe a little more drastic, is to do a
> little header rewriting. Since I do not want to just refuse mail if
> the To: address doesn't agree with the RCPT TO: address, would there be
> much harm in rewriting to To: to reflect the value given at the RCPT TO:
> command? This would let SA do its job more effectively, but I am worried
> that I'm not thinking of a scenario in which mail delivery would suffer.
>
> The other option, of course, is to figure a way to make SA check the
> RCPT TO: header instead of To:. Conceptually, is this the wrong way to
> approach the problem?

I think my best solution is to use a combination of both. Instead of
rewriting the From: address (someone quoted it as being Mortal Sin),
I will utilize the Envelope-to: header. Now I just have to get SA to
check this header, which is an exercise for myself.

Thanks for listening!

hank