On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:26 am, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Eric Renfro wrote:
> > Yes, as Steve mentioned in this thread, I've tried that, and they don't
> > even come close to a match...
> > Not in any of the cases, success or failure.
>
> Well, I think the right way to pursue this is to get something that does
> tell us where the failure is - whether in the client or in the server.
> If we don't know that, it's kind of hard to know what to do!
This is true.. But. What? ;)
I'm trying to solve this, but I have no more options left to test it, at the
moment.
