Hello!
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Nico Erfurth wrote:
> > I mean, that possibility of unescaped unbalanced {} inside {}
> > (which is now possible) is really a bug. It's completely undocumented.
> > You mean, that no one should do that. I agree, and my patch
> > just fixes it.
> > "Nico Erfurth <masta@???>" says, that unescaped unbalanced
> > {} inside {} are quite possible. I disagree. That's all.
>
> I never said that, or you missunderstood me, i said it possible to use a
> } inside, if you escape it like this \}, and you can use a { without
> escaping it, you can even use any combination of { and } if you escape
> everything with \N, i NEVER said that it's possible to use a } like you
> want.
Ok. Exim handles '{' and '}' symbols (sometiomes) in a different way.
There is no word about it in documentstion. It's a bug.
Moreover, I thing it should be fixed by patching the code rather
than documentation. You think, it shouldn't be fixed at all. That's the
wrong way.
Bye. Alex.
