Philip,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Richard.Hall wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that the system filter should not be run, as no delivery
> > attempt is made (or is it?)
> >
> > Is this a bug or not? I'd like to think it is; that would make two I've
> > found in Philip's software in less than thirty years ;-)
>
> Yes, it looks like a bug to me. After marking all the addresses for
> failing, the code still goes on to run the filter before deciding what
> to do with the recipient addresses. It clearly shouldn't.
Thanks. In case it wasn't obvious, a fix is not urgent (for me)
> One bug every 15 years on average is pretty poor going, you know. :-)
Yeah, sorry about that. I've been busy :-(
> > (Anyone else remember ZED?)
>
> Hopefully not, though I am using its successor to write this message.
Hmmm. There's nothing after ZED in my alphabet. Do they use something
different in Cambridge these days?
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Regards,
Richard
