On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, WJCarpenter wrote:
> Yeah, yeah, having the software author's key signature in the printed
> book is a fine idea. With not much additional effort, it could be an
> even better idea.
Interesting. However, I suspect that the timescales are not going to
work here, given that I'm not into PGP at all yet. I may just about
manage to get my key fingerprint into the book, but that's probably
going to be it.
This doesn't stop there being something better in future editions, of
course.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
