On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Peter A. Savitch wrote:
> Hello Philip,
>
> Wednesday, October 02, 2002, 6:47:03 PM, you wrote:
>
> PH> Jim Knoble's, at http://www.ntrnet.net/~jmknoble/exim/exim-logo-new.html
> PH> Jennifer's at http://www.webedited.com/exim/
>
> What do You think about playing around letter 'X' in `Exim' and the
> envelope picture (Jim's)?
>
> I'm very far from design (and much more closer to coding ;-), but I
> see some simplified ("canonical") logo like this:
>
> http://octan.hw.ru/exim-x-envelope-verdana-blue.png
>
> What do You and Jim think I wonder?
Personally, I think the logo itself should not include the literal word
'exim'. Possibly the logo and name can appear together usually, but the
logo should be able to stand alone and look good without the name
>
> PS Thanks to Jim.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Peter mailto:spam4octan@highway.ru
>
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
?%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%20I'm%20very%20far%20from%20design%20(and%20much%20more%20closer%20to%20coding%20;-),%20but%20I%0A>%20>%20see%20some%20simplified%20(%22canonical%22)%20logo%20like%20this:%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%20http://octan.hw.ru/exim-x-envelope-verdana-blue.png%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%20What%20do%20You%20and%20Jim%20think%20I%20wonder?%0A>%20%0A>%20Personally,%20I%20think%20the%20logo%20itself%20should%20not%20include%20the%20literal%20word%0A>%20'exim'.%20Possibly%20the%20logo%20and%20name%20can%20appear%20together%20usually,%20but%20the%0A>%20logo%20should%20be%20able%20to%20stand%20alone%20and%20look%20good%20without%20the%20name%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%20PS%20Thanks%20to%20Jim.%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%20--%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%20##%20List%20details%20at%20http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users%20Exim%20details%20at%20http://www.exim.org/%20##%0A>%20>%0A>%20>%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20 "Reply to this message")
