Greg Ward wrote:
> On 23 September 2002, Kevin P. Fleming said:
>
>>To solve item number 2, I'm thinking of maybe adding an additional
>>configuration option, callout_cache_ignore, which could be a list of
>>regex items. If the (now lowercased) key matches one of those items,
>>then don't bother entering the key into the database (for either a
>>positive or negative verification). I haven't looked at the difficulty
>>of doing this yet, but I'm always up for a challenge.
>
>
> Better, just use an address list. Regexes are only one of the many ways
> to specify a set of addresses with this enormously powerful little
> device.
>
> Greg
OK, instead of adding a new configuration option, I could instead extend
the ACL syntax so that
verify = sender/callout
and
verify = sender/callout-nocache
were both available. This would then mean appropriate ACLs could be
constructed to choose whether to cache or not, and not be limited to
regexes (use whatever type of lookup you like).
