At 09:02 -0400 Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> I am using the exiscan patches to talk to sophie and spamd.
Oh.
I know very little of SpamAssassin, but I'm surprised it's such a CPU hit.
Does it fork other perl processes? In particular, Vipul's Razor doesn't
want to daemonise (some method calls use "exit" instead of
"return"--ouch!). It sounds like you'll need to measure each bit of what
it does; maybe it's cleanable in some regards--otherwise it seems
relatively little of a win to have a spamd :-/
Matt