Nicholas Blackaby wrote:
> It appears that you have misspelt "threshold" (the term "treshold"
> occurs everywhere within the documentation and actual code).
> However, correcting this could be inconvenient for users who have
> already used the misspelt "treshold" in their Exim configuration files!
Sigh :) This was waiting to happen sooner or later. English is not my first
language. I should have looked that one up. I'll leave the misspelling in for
now, since it would really force everyone to edit their configs the next time,
too (I already had a major config change in 4.10-12).
> In the "doc/exiscan-readme.txt" file near line 281, you give an
> example:
>
> exiscan_scanner_regexp_trigger = found in
>
> in which it appears you have accidentally forgotten the "_av_" in the
> option's name.
Fixed, thanks.
> Currently, when exiscan_spamd_condition = 1, a "X-Spam-Score"
> header is added and this works very well. I was wondering if it would
> be possible for exiscan to add other X-Spam- header lines similar to
> the ones added by the spamassassin program. In particular a
> header line indicating which tests had been successful would be
> good.
I'll look into this. The spamd report is multiline. I don't like "parsing" it
too much, so I'll probably end up putting it into a multiline header in its
original form.
> Also, would it be possible for exiscan to change the subject of
> messages suspected of being SPAM (a configurable option)? I
> suspect that their are some mail clients which are unable to filter
> mail based on information placed in non-standard headers?
Yes, that may go in too. I use Mozilla Mail which can filter on custom headers
fine. I just checked out Outlook and it does not seem to be able to do so :)
I'll probably wait a few weeks before making further feature additions. I want
to let the code "settle down" a bit and see it there are any more bugs, since I
rewrote most of the patch with -12.
regards,
/tom
--
Tom Kistner <tom@???>
ICQ 1501527 dcanthrax@efnet
http://duncanthrax.net
