On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
> freebsd-stable
> exim 3.36
>
> this is an invocation without emacs.
>
> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t
I don't believe you. :-) I am 99% sure it was actually
/usr/sbin/sendmail -t rw@???
That would provoke precisely the message you got.
> A message that you sent using the -t command line option contained no
> addresses that were not also on the command line, and were therefore
> suppressed. This left no recipient addresses, and so no delivery could
> be attempted.
This is only given when all the addresses extracted by -t are then
suppressed because they also appear on the command line. Have a look at
the documentation for extract_addresses_remove_arguments. It discusses
the mess that is the "specification" for -t.
> ------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. ------
>
> Received: from phui by psg.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1)
> id 17mQio-000O6d-00; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 20:20:50 -0700
> To: rw@???
> From: db-admin@???
> Subject: Requested RIPE database object changes
> Reply-To: db-admin@???
> Message-Id: <E17mQio-000O6d-00@???>
> Sender: WhoIs Database <whois@???>
> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 20:20:50 -0700
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
