Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Dalbec wrote:
>
> > Any idea when this will be documented in the specification on
> > www.exim.org?
>
> No.
>
> > Maybe you should add this by default in convert4r4 (unless
> > helo_strict_syntax is present).
>
> I don't want to encourage it any more than is really necessary.
I thought the point of convert4r4 was to produce an Exim 4 configure
script that behaves as much like the Exim 3 configure script as
possible. Is that not the case?
Thanks,
John Dalbec