Re: [Exim] HELO syntax check

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M--+--+-+++\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M..M+\M\MMMMPhilip Hazel at <-
M+\MMMMMMDavid Woodhouse at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tamas TEVESZ
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] HELO syntax check
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Philip Hazel wrote:

> I propose the following compromise: if HELO/EHLO has been rejected
> because of a syntax error (or indeed, for any reason), then reject all
> subsequent commands (except RSET, HELP, QUIT, NOOP) until a valid
> HELO/EHLO has been received.

but wouldn't that break rfc-conformance ? :>

anyway, i wholeheartedly agree.


--
[-]



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] HELO syntax checkRe: [Exim] HELO syntax check->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)