On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Tom Marazita wrote:
> You can see where the problem occurs for the second address
> (chompdode@engineering); the
> nis_aliases router says: "chompdode@??? is a duplicate
> address: discarded."
I'll look into this. Way back in testing (Exim 3.953) a bug like this
was supposed to have been fixed:
55. If an address was redirected to itself more than once (e.g. by two
different "redirect" routers, or because of the use of "unseen", it was
incorrectly discarded as a duplicate address.
It may be that the bug wasn't sufficiently squashed...
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
