Re: [Exim] empty sender in autoreply transport and errors

Autor: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Data:
Para: Tamas TEVESZ
CC: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [Exim] empty sender in autoreply transport and errors_to option

"Tamas TEVESZ" <ice@???> (Monday, August 05, 2002 7:13 PM)

> On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > > errors_to = \
> > Errors-To? Does anybody ever follow that thing?
>
> khm. there's quite a significant difference between "errors_to"
> (as in an exim option) and "Errors-To:" (as in an old, misused, not
> used anymore header).

Bah. Yes, you are right. :(

    -srs

Esta mensaxe é parte do seguinte fío:
	Árbore completa do fío ordenada por data
	Tamas TEVESZ o
	Peter A. Savitch o

Re: [Exim] empty sender in autoreply transport and errors_to…