On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> FWIW, I just got burned by this as well. Perhaps there is some more
> cunning magick that could be added to the convert script (which didn't
> catch it)? I had a look myself but couldn't make much sense of it in the
> short time I had. Would this be a hard problem or is it just another
> regex tweak?
The latest convert4r4 script is supposed to pick up cases like this, but
maybe it misses some of them. If you give me examples, I can tweak the
regex, for that is indeed all that should be needed.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
