Re: [Exim] How to change message failure strings?

Top Pagina
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Auteur: Glenn Carver
Datum:  
Aan: exim-users
CC: Glenn.Carver
Onderwerp: Re: [Exim] How to change message failure strings?
At 8:46pm +0100 23/7/02, Philip Hazel wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Glenn Carver wrote:
>
>>  faillocaluser:
>>     driver = redirect
>>     allow_fail
>>     data = :fail: No such local address could be found

>>
>> .. which works but somehow seems overkill. I would have thought it
>> would be possible to add a log_message or error_message option to the
>> router which specifies the message to return to the sender.
>
>But *which* router? A router doesn't know that it's the last one. There
>may be another one after it that handles the address.


Doesn't matter. If the router doesn't match and testing moves to the
next router the failure message option for that router is not used.
Some routers might be doing very specific things and it would be nice
to tailor the error message if a router fails & no_more is given.

>
>> Since any
>> router can have the no_more option I was expecting a generic option
>> but couldn't see one. Although I can do what I want for the case
>> when I run out of routers, I don't know how to change the error text
>> for a router which fails and has no_more as an option.
>
>That's when a router declines. Yes, it could perhaps specify a message
>in that case, and I'll think about that. But for the "run out of
>routers" case, I think the message has to be specified separately. After
>all, the final router may have a "domains" setting (for example) and so
>would be skipped for some domains.


Agreed. I guess what I had in mind is similar to how the ACLs work
with a : 'deny message = no such luck' at the end. The analogy I
guess is a set of routers at the very end which use :fail: to give a
specific message for whatever condition you like and that's all they
do (message for a virtual domain, cancelled users etc).

Part of my reason for wanting to do this is that the current
'unrouteable address' message is not specific enough (i.e. could mean
an internal network failure?). I was hoping that if I made it
blindingly obvious there's no-one here with that address, the spam
merchants might actually take the address off their lists (one day).
You never know..

Thanks
         Glenn