On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:29, Alexander Sabourenkov wrote:
> Hmm. Now let's see.
> The type of the attachment is determined by its Content-Type header.
> Now what's wrong with Mozilla sending a multipart/message-rfc822 attachment
> having a Content-Disposition: attachment; name="ForwardedMessage.eml" ?
>
> Extension can have some relevance to the actual content type for the MUA if
> and only if the stated content-type is 'application/octet-stream' if I'm
> not mistaken.
You've not ventured into the world of windows have you?
Extension is everything, bugger the MIME type.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
