--
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:21:27AM +0400, Alexander Sabourenkov wrote:
| >Not a problem with .eml (other than what's been pointed out already),
| >but mozilla (et al) can be configured to forward files inline rather
| >than as attatchments.
| >
| >edit-->preferences-->composition-->forward messages inline
| >
| >I don't know how many clients you have, but...
|
| Even more offtopic, but...
| this way you'll lose the original composition ( attachments,
| multipart-alternatives, original headers and such) of the
| original message, which in some cases defeats the purpose of forwarding.
Sending "eml" format to a non-Microsoft user defeats the purpose of
communication. There are ways to tell Mozilla to behave like a normal
Internet mail program, but since I don't use it I don't know the
specific incantation. (it is the "attachment" option right by the
"inline" option, IIRC)
I think that "inline" option is there so that you can quote and edit
the message you are forwarding.
| If you're after malicious content in the attachments, you'll be better off
| with some trial version of antivirus,
Those things aren't malicious on my system, they're just plain
annoying. It would also be annoying if someone sent me a sample of
their /dev/random (the usefulness of the two is identical).
-D
--
Many a man claims to have unfailing love,
but a faithful man who can find?
Proverbs 20:6
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/
--
[ Content of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
