oh of course! I should read the log entries more carefully... (slap
on forehead).
Thanks!
Glenn
>On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Glenn Carver wrote:
>
>> Take the following log entries. The first recipient (msg 17URfp)
>> (which is a forward from our system), fails saying the domain
>> processrequest.com is unrouteable. Yet the following 2 messages
>> (17URfP and 17URfQ) work fine. What's going on here? Why is
>> processrequest.com unrouteable for the first user but not for the
>> other two (paranoia: have I fouled up somewhere in converting from
>> exim3->4).
>
>Not your problem.
>
>> 17URfP-0000Pc-00 <= listman@???
>> H=dal1bs070.processrequest.com (DAL1BS070) [216.39.67.120] P=smtp
>> S=5067
>> 17URfP-0000Pc-00 ** d.e.sh@??? <du@???>
>> R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: SMTP error
>> from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<listman@???>
>> SIZE=6209: host dirc.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.51]: 550 Unrouteable do
>> main 'ProcessRequest.com'
>
>The host dirc.bris.ac.uk can't route the domain 'ProcessRequest.com',
>and so rejects the sender. Why it can't route that domain is its
>problem, not yours. The other hosts either can route it, or are not
>checking senders.
>
>The domain seems perfectly OK.
>
>--
>Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
>ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
