On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I second that. It was provided as a proof-of-concept hack, for further
> development.
That's why I'm not rushing into doing anything.
> Indeed. Actually the ABI is a whole can of worms all on its own -- as soon
> as we build Exim with -rdynamic we start exporting all kinds of internal
> functions which Philip may want to change and/or remove at any time.
That's the kind of thing I didn't even know. I need to do research.
There is at present no time...
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
