On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, John W Baxter wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that a file included with .include would require a
> HUP of the daemon after being changed (just like a change to the
> configuration file proper)? I get that idea by implication from spec
> section 6.3.
Yes, you are correct.
> If so, it's a likely source of confusion, since we've learned that "you
> don't have to HUP after changing a file mentioned in the configuration
> file...they're read when needed."
>
> It's probably worthy of explicit mention in the spec if true.
Absolutely! Thank you.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
