On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Chris Edwards wrote:
> The v4 FAQ A0424 suggests routing the addresses directly to a transport
> - but as I understand it, I can't change the address at the same time.
> ( which I want to do )
That's true. I suppose I should think about this issue.
> Am I missing something here ? Can this sort of thing be achieved in v4 ?
The only way I can think of is to do a double-cycle through Exim. Route
each address to a pipe transport (adding the header). Make the pipe
transport obey the command
exim -f $sender_address new@ddress
That way, you'll get n different messages passed back into Exim. Then
route new@ddress to wherever you want.
Wheeler's Law Strikes Again ("an extra level of indirection solves many
problems").
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
