Re: [Exim] using -f option with From: in the body

Góra strony
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Will Renkel {QA1403}
Data:  
Dla: exim-users
Temat: Re: [Exim] using -f option with From: in the body
I had a mail creation script that out From: in the header.
It worked very well with sendmail on other machines.
I had to use the -f option on some machines because thbey did NOT read mail.
So using -f I forced replies to a machine where I could read them.
Again, I already had this thing.
So now comes cygwin and exim.
I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Most stuff I had ported with almost no change.
But I saw this anomoly and was surprised as exim dropped in so easily

Is that clear enough?
I have programmed around it already.
Just thought some one else might know something or want to know this.

Make it a GREAT DAY!


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Renkel - Motorola Test Labs & Support
1501 W. Shure Drive - Arlington Heights, IL 60004
(847) 632-4416 - Will.Renkel@???

"Golf and bowling are not a matter of life and death ...
     they transcend such trivial matters!"


"da little BIG DOG!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------

    >From exim-users-admin@??? Tue Jun 18 12:55:54 CDT 2002
    >Received: from quake.xnet.com [198.147.221.67]
    >    by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.12)
    >    for renkel@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:55:54 -0500 (CDT)
    >Received: from exim-colo-01.whoc.theplanet.co.uk (exim-colo-01.whoc.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.251]) by mail.xnet.com (8.9.3+Sun/XNet-3.0R) with ESMTP id MAA00773 for <lucky22@???>; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:41:05 -0500 (CDT)
    >Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1])
    >    by exim-colo-01.whoc.theplanet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #4)
    >    id 17KMyU-0002SJ-00; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:41:02 +0100
    >Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36] helo=VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca)
    >    by exim-colo-01.whoc.theplanet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #4)
    >    id 17KMwp-0002LJ-00
    >    for exim-users@???; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:39:19 +0100
    >Received: from cthulhu.gerg.ca ([24.200.173.38]) by
    >          VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15
    >          MR003 Jul 24 2001 16:23:26) with ESMTP id GXWX1I00.KRY for
    >          <exim-users@???>; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:39:18 -0400
    >Received: from gward by cthulhu.gerg.ca with local (Exim 4.02)
    >    id 17KMwn-0001Rc-00
    >    for exim-users@???; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:39:17 -0400
    >To: "'exim-users@???'" <exim-users@???>
    >Subject: Re: [Exim] using -f option with From: in the body
    >Message-ID: <20020618173917.GA5520@???>
    >Mail-Followup-To: "'exim-users@???'" <exim-users@???>
    >References: <796456A0F96AD511A0AC009027B0F74101D4772A@???>
    >Mime-Version: 1.0
    >Content-Disposition: inline
    >In-Reply-To: <796456A0F96AD511A0AC009027B0F74101D4772A@???>
    >User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
    >From: Greg Ward <gward@???>
    >content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    >Sender: exim-users-admin@???
    >Errors-To: exim-users-admin@???
    >X-BeenThere: exim-users@???
    >X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
    >Precedence: bulk
    >List-Help: <mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject=help>
    >List-Post: <mailto:exim-users@exim.org>
    >List-Subscribe: <http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
    >    <mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject=subscribe>
    >List-Id: A user list for the exim MTA <exim-users.exim.org>
    >List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
    >    <mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject=unsubscribe>
    >List-Archive: <http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/>
    >Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:39:17 -0400
    >Content-Type: text/plain;
    > charset=us-ascii
    >X-UIDL: Y;]"!]LA"!Km(#!I<M"!
    >Status: RO
    >Content-Length: 745
    >
    >On 18 June 2002, Renkel Willis-QA1403 said:
    >> With sendmail the -f option over rides From: in the body
    >> In exim it does not.
    >> Anyone else find this difference?
    >> Need opinions on fixing it.

    >
    >Define "overrides".  "exim -f" only sets the envelope sender.  It
    >doesn't change any headers.  And, as near as I can tell, Exim doesn't
    >take the envelope sender from the "From" header -- the envelope sender
    >is controlled by the config file.  I'm testing with Exim 4 right now,
    >but I don't recall any different behaviour under Exim 3.

    >
    >Perhaps if you could explain what you're trying to achieve, we could
    >help you get there.

    >
    >        Greg

    >
    >--

    >
    >## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

    >

    >

    >