Hello everyone,
I am seeking others' verification of the way I interpret the following
rejection in my rejectlog:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002-06-17 08:50:47 17Jvy2-0002iB-00 rejected from
idk.carlsoncraft.com (tcmail2.tcusa.com) [198.12.16.12]: temporarily
unable to verify sender address <Service@???> (try later)
Recipients: ppublish@???
P Received: from idk.carlsoncraft.com ([198.12.16.12]
helo=tcmail2.tcusa.com)
by intrepid.marinar.com with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 17Jvy2-0002iB-00
for <ppublish@???>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:50:47 -0400
P Received: from tcexch2.taylorcorp.com (mailout.tc.inet
[172.25.2.12])
by tcmail2.tcusa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA87142BF
for <ppublish@???>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:48:24 -0400
(EDT)
P Received: from ccexch1.carlsoncraft.inet (ccexchange.com
[172.25.75.30]) by tcexch2.taylorcorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft
Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id M8LX38GN; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:48:38 -0500
P Received: by ccexch1.carlsoncraft.inet with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19)
id <MXJKX8XB>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:51:38 -0500
I Message-ID:
<B8662649CFC46E479B680DC5DF0BBBD30186F8E9@???>
F From: "service@???" <Service@???>
T To: 'Perfection Publishing' <ppublish@???>
Subject: RE: acct 158423 (HELP WITH INVITATION)
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:51:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I notice that while the helo is sent as "tcmail2.tcusa.com", the
IP of the sending MTA is [198.12.16.12], which reverse-resolves to
"idk.carlsoncraft.com". I have the following options set in
exim.conf:
sender_verify_hosts_callback = *
sender_verify_callback_domains = *
sender_verify_hosts = *
sender_verify = true
headers_checks_fail = true
What I am investigating into is which of these options prevents the
above mail from being accepted. I also would like to know if anything
else from the rejectlog looks out of the ordinary.
I appreciate all help and advise, and hope to hear from someone.
cordially,
hank
