On May 26 dman wrote:
>On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote:
>| Because it's a Friday afternoon it took me a little while to spot that the
>| mail was being delivered with local-esmtp seemingly ignoring my -oMr.
>|
>| I'm not asking for a change to the Exim code; however, I'd request a note
>| put in the spec in the relevant place. (5.3?)
>
>In the spec the -oMr option is discussed. It says to see the
>discussion of -oMa. The discussion of -oMa has this :
>
> In other circumstances, [-oM options] are ignored unless the
> caller is trusted.
>
>Is the user invoking exim with -oMr "trusted"?
Yes. But I think something different is happening because of the "-bs".
