--
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote:
| I used the above with my invented protocol "lsmtp" to test a local_scan
| function I've written for uvscan (I'll announce it when I've a had a day
| or so for a few more pairs of eyes to find my bugs first ;) on messages
| which go through our mlm (the idea being that it resends using -oMr lsmtp
| which my function detects to avoid scanning the same message twice).
|
| [ The reason I'm not using exiscan is I want to add warning headers rather
| than reject the mail. ]
|
| Because it's a Friday afternoon it took me a little while to spot that the
| mail was being delivered with local-esmtp seemingly ignoring my -oMr.
|
| I'm not asking for a change to the Exim code; however, I'd request a note
| put in the spec in the relevant place. (5.3?)
In the spec the -oMr option is discussed. It says to see the
discussion of -oMa. The discussion of -oMa has this :
In other circumstances, [-oM options] are ignored unless the
caller is trusted.
Is the user invoking exim with -oMr "trusted"?
-D
--
Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge,
but he who hates correction is stupid.
Proverbs 12:1
GnuPG key :
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg
--
[ Content of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
