[Exim] Memory fault in Exim when empty message supplied by S…

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Ollie Cook
Data:  
A: exim-users
Assumpte: [Exim] Memory fault in Exim when empty message supplied by SMTP
Hi,

A customer of ours has brought to my attention an error they received from Exim
when they were simulating an SMTP session. On investigating the error (empty
message body gives 451 after DATA), it seems to be more sinister.

The symptoms are:

    220 ClaraNET Mail Service ESMTP (HOST.uk.clara.net)
    EHLO mutare.noc.clara.net
    250-HOST.uk.clara.net Hello mutare.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.94]
    250-SIZE
    250-ETRN
    250-PIPELINING
    250 HELP
    MAIL FROM:<an@???>
    250 <an@???> is syntactically correct
    RCPT TO:<another@???>
    250 <another@???> verified
    354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
    DATA
    .
    451 Error while writing spool file


On the server side (running at maximum debugging level) this was the output.
I have started the copy/paste from where things start to look dubious and I
have obfuscated some details:

    >>Original headers (size=-1):


    xim/spool/etrn/${domain}
     user=claranet
     bsmtp=domain
     check_string = "."
     escape_string = ".."
     prefix = ""
     suffix = ""
     mode = 0644


    # Remove Delivery For Scanning
    # ----------------------------
    #
    # Messages are sent to the virus scanning servers
    # by this transport


    send_to_virus_host_smtp:
      driver = smtp
      hosts  = antivirus.uk.clara.net


    end


    # handles the alias file
    System_aliases:
      driver = aliasfile
      file_transport = address_file
      pipe_transport = address_pipe


    **** debug string overflowed buffer ****
    search_tidyup called
    >>Final headers:
    P Received: from mutare.noc.clara.net ([195.8.70.94])
            by HOST.uk.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)
            id 178Nmq-0008r9-00
            for another@???; Thu, 16 May 2002 17:07:29 +0100
    I Message-Id: <E178Nmq-0008r9-00@???>
    F From: an@???
    B Bcc:
      Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:07:29 +0100


    xim/spool/etrn/${domain}
     user=claranet
     bsmtp=domain
     check_string = "."
     escape_string = ".."
     prefix = ""
     suffix = ""
     mode = 0644


    # Remove Delivery For Scanning
    # ----------------------------
    #
    # Messages are sent to the virus scanning servers
    # by€#
         ILOG: 0 MAIN
      Message abandoned: Spool write error (Bad address) while receiving message from mutare.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.94]
    SMTP>> 451 Error while writing spool file


I tracked down the error message to this section of code in accept.c:

    if (fflush(data_file) == EOF || ferror(data_file) ||
        fsync(fileno(data_file)) < 0 || (accept_ferror)(fin))
      {
      char *msg_errno = strerror(errno);
      BOOL input_error = (accept_ferror)(fin) != 0;
      char *msg = string_sprintf("%s error (%s) while receiving message from %s",
        input_error? "Input read" : "Spool write",
        msg_errno,
        (sender_fullhost != NULL)? sender_fullhost : sender_ident);


"Bad address" is EFAULT, which one of fflush, fsync, ferror is returning. My
bet is on write() which can return EFAULT when called by fflush.

I couldn't determine why data_file might end up with a value that would cause
fflush() to break, though, so any comments would be appreciated.

Also of interest is that Exim printed out part of the contents of the config
file and overflowed the debug buffer ("**** debug string overflowed buffer
****"), which I isolated to this code, also in accept.c:

    DEBUG(9)
      {
      debug_printf(">>Original headers (size=%d):\n", message_size-1);
      for (h = header_list->next; h != NULL; h = h->next)
        debug_printf("%s", h->text);
      debug_printf("\n");
      if (next != NULL) debug_printf("%s", next->text);
      }


So I guess that here also 'h' was not pointing to what it was supposed to point
to, when the message is empty.

The version of Exim on this server is 3.22 and I found the following entry in
the ChangeLog which may be related, but I would appreciate a confirmation of
this before I upgrade this server, if that might be possible:

    3.30/25:


    If a write error occurred when updating the -H file, an incorrect error
    message could be output (errno not preserved). This has been fixed, and more
    detail is now included in the message.


    (although at the point of this error I think Exim is writing the -D file)


The bug does not occur 100% of the time. I tried about 10 times and got this
behaviour on perhaps 8 occasions.

Any ideas as to what is causing this behaviour would be appreciated. If there
is any further data I can provide to assist, do let me know.

Ollie

--
Oliver Cook    Systems Administrator, ClaraNET
ollie@???               020 7903 3065