Re: [Exim] Conditions

On Wed, 15 May 2002, Philip Hazel wrote:

> That's why I said "may".

Ahhh... "might" would have been clearer ;-).

> I wasn't sure what you were trying to do. "no_more" stops the chain of
> processing if the router runs and declines. If the router is skipped
> because the preconditions fail, no_more has no effect. "domains",
> "local_parts", "condition", etc. are preconditions.

All right, I'm beginning to see how it works.


--
Juha Saarinen