Re: [Exim] use of "first_delivery"

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Phil Chambers
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] use of "first_delivery"
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Phil Chambers wrote:

> If a message is queued on arrival because of smtp_accept_queue_per_connection, for
> example, would the subsequent queue run be regarded as "not first delivery"?


No. That is, it _would_ be a "first delivery".

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.