Re: [Exim] [PATCH] ssmtp (old-style SSL) support for exim 3.…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Toshio Kumagai
Date:  
To: Matt Bernstein
CC: exim-users, Matthew Grant, Nigel Metheringham, Robert van der Meulen, Mark Baker
Subject: Re: [Exim] [PATCH] ssmtp (old-style SSL) support for exim 3.3x viainetd for old style SSL MTAs ...
Matt Bernstein wrote:
>
> Why not just (not via inetd) use stunnel (assuming you want to force AUTH
> to prevent yourself becoming an open relay)? It Works For Us(tm) on our
> Debian stable setup.
>
>         /usr/sbin/stunnelsmtp -d 465 -r 587 -p /path/to/mail.pem -- ssmtp

>
> [main config]
> daemon_smtp_port = 25:587
>
> [sample acl]
>   accept  condition = ${if eq{$interface_port}{587}{1}{0}}
>           endpass
>           message = AUTH required for message submission (thanks stunnel :)
>           authenticated = *

>
> (with Exim 3 you can use multiple config files)


    Yep.
    I cannot understand the difference between his patch
    and exim over stunnel.
    I've ran exim with stunnel over ssmtp (465/tcp) since
    exim release 2.x.
    I remember that 3.16x is the first experimental release
    of exim with TLS(STARTTLS).


>
> At 09:53 +0100 Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> >On 1 Apr 2002, Matthew Grant wrote:
> >
> >> I reccomend that it get included
> >> in the next point release of exim 3.3x, and be intergrated into exim
> >> 4.0x as it will solve a lot of problems supporting legacy-style SSL SMTP
> >> from various MTAs on Unix/Linux, DOS/windows and MAC OS.
> >
> >I'll certainly take a look at the code for 4.xx, but I'm hoping not to
> >make any more changes to 3.3x if I can help it.
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##


--
            *** Save Solaris x86 ***
  Toshio Kumagai    TK2959 / TK127-AP
            Toshio_Kumagai@???, Japan