Re: [Exim] Empty sender <>

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Paul Overell
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Empty sender <>
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Paul Overell wrote:

> I can't help on how to do this, but an empty sender <> is legitimate for
> Delivery Status Notifications (RFC1894) and for Message Disposition
> Notifications (RFC2298). So you might want to consider making these a
> special case.


It's also been the standard for plain ol' bounce messages for a long
time. See RFC 2821 for the latest statement of this.

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.