On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 08:42:12PM +0200, sharun@??? wrote:
> can we simply say "550 Cannot route back to sender" instead of:
>
> 550-Verification failed for <*****>
> 550-Called: ********
> 550-Sent: RCPT TO:<*********>
> 550-Response: 550 Unknown local part ******* in <*************>
Being one of the people who went through great pains to improve Exim error
messages (i.e. output something where people aren't going to come back and
ask me why their mail was rejected and what the error message meant), I have
to ask:
Why do you want to revert to a less useful error message?
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page:
http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@??? for PGP key
