On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Shows wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Sometimes you just read the answer, and somehow don't read it. I just
> needed someone to push me into working a little harder. Using "bh" option
> found the problem. I have a rather long list of hosts not to accept, and it
> was getting trapped checking the hosts out. I guess I need to clean up my
> list.
>
> (host_reject = /usr/exim/tables/host.reject)
>
Actually, if you always use the *numeric* IP addresses of the hosts, and
never names, then this check wont take that long..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: exim-users-admin@??? [mailto:exim-users-admin@exim.org]On
> Behalf Of Tamas TEVESZ
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: exim-users@???
> Subject: RE: [Exim] Exim SMTP response
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Shows wrote:
>
> > That is what I thought, but using "nslookup {ipaddress}" I get immediate
>
> and to all whom it may concern,
>
> 1) the answer is a FAQ entry
> 2) the answer is in the archives gazillion times
> 3) once you get a reply at least try it (alternatively, 'why do you
> ask if you know if better anyway?')
> 4) don't top-post
>
>
> additionally, i'd like to propose to add a specific "30 seconds"
> literal to Q0026. it might help a bit (?).
>
> --
> [-]
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
> details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
--
