On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Phil Pennock wrote:
> So, perhaps a better request for the wish-list is to have the -d output
> always line-buffered; since it's for debugging, not for normal use, the
> slight performance hit shouldn't really be an issue.
It already should be. There's a call to fflush() after every
debug_write().
> Avoiding feaping creaturisation is nice. :^) Perhaps worthy of a FAQ
> comment, since it might nudge the reader's thought processes over to
> "getting the output I want, from the tools available" from "getting the
> output I want, from Exim". Always a good gentle reminder, for Unix
> applications.
>
> PH, thoughts on these two feature requests as a replacement for the
> previous wishlist item?
I think adding timestamps in Exim itself could have other uses; it is
also a very small addition.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
