On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Theodore Knab wrote:
> I noticed that my headers look forged because they are.
>
> Is there a way to rewrite them look authentic ?
>
> My current rewrite:
>
> *@albert.washcoll.edu $1@??? Eh
Your headers look completely reasonable to me.
The reason the "may be forged" is inserted by dns2.washcoll.edu, is
becuase your helo argument was albert.washcoll.edu, but their reverse
DNS lookup of your IP gave WC201.washcoll.edu. Its just an alert that
there is a discrepancy. Personally, I dont give a fig what your helo
name is, _or_ what your reverse DNS says, as long as I have the IP
address.
> #From ted@??? Tue Feb 12 09:35:32 2002
> #Return-path: <ted@???>
> #Envelope-to: tjk@???
> #Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:35:32 -0500
> #Received: from dns2.washcoll.edu ([192.146.226.11])
> # by www.breezysolutions.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
> # id 16ae1n-0000aj-00
> # for <tjk@???>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:35:27 -0500
> #Received: from albert.washcoll.edu (WC201.washcoll.edu [192.146.226.201] (may be forged))
> # by dns2.washcoll.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06854
> # for <tjk@???>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:36:24 -0500
> #Received: from ted by albert.washcoll.edu with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
> # id 16ae1U-0007cE-00
> # for <tjk@???>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:35:08 -0500
> #Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:35:08 -0500
> #From: "Theodore J. Knab" <ted.knab@???>
> #To: tjk@???
> #Subject: mail test 2
> #Message-ID: <20020212143508.GA29269@???>
> #Mime-Version: 1.0
> #Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> #Content-Disposition: inline
> #User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
> #Organization: Academic Computing
> #Motto: I make Unix friendly and secure for users.
> #Sender: sysadmin <ted@???>
> #Status: RO
> #Content-Length: 240
> #Lines: 9
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
--
